The Master of Business Administration program at Rice’s Jones Graduate School of Business is No. 22 in the United States in Bloomberg Businessweek’s Best Business Schools MBA ranking for 2021 — and No. 5 for entrepreneurship.

The ranking places the Jones School among the nation’s most distinguished, including those at universities such as Harvard, Stanford, Duke, Georgetown and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Bloomberg Businessweek team surveyed students, alumni and recruiters and gathered data provided by the universities to rank schools based on five indexes: compensation after graduation, diversity, learning, networking and entrepreneurship.

“This recognition in entrepreneurship has consistently told the story that we care about and support the entrepreneurial mindset, business plans and dreams of our students, alumni and the undergraduate and graduate community at large,” wrote Peter Rodriguez, dean of the Jones School. “I’m very proud of our standing.”

Rice Business has consistently been ranked among the top 10 graduate entrepreneurship programs in the nation, reflecting the depth and breadth of resources for entrepreneurs during their time at Rice and beyond. The school’s entrepreneurship classes emphasize a combination of mindset and skill set and focus on multiple stages of the entrepreneurial process.

The Rice MBA full-time program provides students with a comprehensive learning experience that combines specialized coursework and real-world experience to improve and amplify their strategy, leadership and critical decision-making credentials. The program features innovative classes, expert faculty and a diverse group of students.

Rice Business is recognized by several publications’ rankings for its programs, including the MBA, MBA for Executives and MBA for Professionals. The school is internationally known for the research and thought leadership of its faculty.

To view the complete Bloomberg Businessweek rankings and methodology information, visit https://www.bloomberg.com/business-schools.

Yan “Anthea” Zhang, the Fayez Sarofim Vanguard Chair Professor of Strategy at the Rice’s Jones Graduate School of Business, has been selected as a fellow of the Strategic Management Society (SMS), a distinction honoring members of the society who have made significant contributions to the theory and practice of strategic management.

“We are so proud that Anthea has been selected as a fellow of the Strategic Management Society. It’s a great honor, well deserved and a reflection on her leadership in the field,” said Peter Rodriguez, dean of the Jones School. “While we intentionally build a culture of support and resources for our faculty, it is Anthea’s creative approach to her research and its relevant connection to business and the workplace that earned her a place with such a distinguished group of scholars.”

Zhang’s research is focused on CEO succession and corporate governance of publicly traded companies as well as foreign direct investment and technological entrepreneurship in emerging markets, notably China.

Her research has been published in top academic journals such as the Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing and Journal of International Business Studies. She is widely cited in top business media outlets such as Harvard Business Review, The Economist, Business Week, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, USA Today and the Financial Times.

Zhang is president-elect of the Strategic Management Society and serves as associate editor of Strategic Management Journal. She came to Rice in 2001 and has received the Strategic Management Society Emerging Scholar Award (2010), served as an associate editor of the Academy of Management Journal and served on the board of directors of the International Corporate Governance Society during her tenure.

Based on research by Arun Gopalakrishnan, Zhenling Jiang, Yulia Nevskaya and Raphael Thomadsen

• Participating in a loyalty program won’t make customers spend more dollars per visit.
• However, even a simple loyalty program can woo customers into visiting more or prevent them from straying.
• Surprisingly, non-tiered loyalty programs have the biggest effect on customers who are either intensely loyal or have demonstrated limited interest in the firm. 

Almost everyone who has shopped at a supermarket or hopped on a plane has been invited to join a customer loyalty club. But even the businesses that offer these programs are sometimes unsure of who uses and benefits from them most.

Rice Business Professor Arun Gopalakrishnan joined Zhenling Jiang from the University of Pennsylvania and Yulia Nevskaya and Raphael Thomadsen from Washington University in St. Louis to study non-tiered loyalty programs (these differ from tiered loyalty programs, which offer more benefits and exclusivity to customers who spend more).

These simpler programs, the researchers found, can have a striking value: the program they studied increased customer value by almost 30 percent during a five-year time frame, they found. That’s considerably higher than previously found in this type of loyalty program. Almost as surprisingly, the program’s effect on moderately loyal customers – seemingly among the likely beneficiaries – was minimal. Instead, it had the most dramatic impact on customers who had previously showed either great engagement with the firm or almost no engagement at all. 

“The main upside of the program was that it got people to stick around with the firm, preventing defection,” Gopalakrishnan said on the podcast INFORMS. At the company he studied, more than 80 percent of the total lift came simply from keeping customers in the fold. 

Typically, he added, loyalty programs are assumed to be most worthwhile to frequent or high-spending customers. But the researchers found that very low-frequency customers who joined the program were also more likely to stick around, even though it didn’t make much economic difference for them. “There may be some psychological benefit, just from being part of the program, that helps keeps these less frequent customers from walking away,” Gopalakrishnan suggested.  

Researchers have found it fairly easy to study tiered loyalty programs. But the exact value of the simpler, non-tiered programs is more obscure. That’s because the previous studies typically included customers who had self-selected by joining a loyalty program. 

Gopalakrishnan’s research took a different approach. To address the imprecisions of past research, he and his team built a data collection model that let them examine consumer behavior both before and after customers joined a loyalty program. Importantly, the model also distinguished between program members (some of whom had been automatically signed up for the program) and nonmembers. 

Using this more detailed model, the research team studied the behavior of more than 5,500 men’s hair salon clients over 30 months. The research was possible because the team had already been following these clients to track how much money they spent during each visit, their frequency of visits, the types of services and products they used and if they used any type of discounts. 

Then, ten months into the study, the hair salon chain created a non-tiered loyalty program. Customers who joined received a coupon via email for $5 off for every $100 they spent. Other customers chose not to join. That allowed researchers to compare the behavior in the two groups, with non-members as the control group.  

The loyalty program had no impact on the amount of money clients spent during each visit, researchers found. Gopalakrishnan’s team speculated that this might be because industries like hair salons have only a limited ability to increase sales of goods and services. Hair, after all, only grows so fast. On the other hand, the loyalty program did appear to influence how often customers visited. 

Rather than increasing the frequency of visits for moderate clients, however, non-tiered loyalty programs changed the behavior of customers who were at the two poles of engagement: those who rarely showed up and those who visited so often they were practically on a first-name basis with their stylist. 

At a time when consumers are overwhelmed with marketing ploys to lure their time and dollars, a thoughtful loyalty program can indeed be a good business investment, Gopalakrishnan’s team concluded. However, managers should bear in mind that the benefit may not be exactly what they expect. Instead of giving a gentle nudge to turn steady customers into bigger spenders, good loyalty programs seem best at corralling outliers into the herd. 

Arun Gopalakrishnan is an Assistant Professor of Marketing at Rice Business.

Zhenling Jiang is an Assistant Professor of Marketing at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Raphael Thomadsen and Yulia Nevskaya are a Professor of Marketing and an Assistant Professor of Marketing, respectively, at the Olin Business School of Washington University in St. Louis. 

To learn more, please see: Gopalakrishnan, A., Jiang, Z., Nevskaya, Y., & Thomadsen, R. (2021). Can non-tiered customer loyalty programs be profitable? Marketing Science, 40(3), 508–526. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2020.1268